It's easy to understand how victims may think we're part of the criminal justice system. Many (formerly) independent domestic violence programs are being forced into partnerships with their local law enforcement agency or Family Justice Centers as a matter of survival. Victims see and hear their advocates sharing information and strategizing with police officers and prosecutors. They see us arriving with the police at their homes. Fundraising events show advocates giving awards to a local officer, or the sheriff cutting the ribbon for a new shelter. Some law enforcement agencies employ victim support specialists and EAP counselors for both victims and perpetrators. It's confusing — even for us sometimes — just what our role is in the domestic violence community.
The advocate should be the one person who is there solely for the victim, open to exploring any and all options.
Our role is to provide information and support so the victim can decide how to best protect her own interests and safety. If we even appear to be a part of the criminal justice system, the victim of an officer will not trust us. Our independence can be compromised — or appear compromised — by the close working relationships that accompany efforts to build coordinated community response and inter-agency collaboration. Victims are often left more alone, more isolated, and more at risk.
To best serve your community, you must know how your local law enforcement handles complaints about the behavior and actions of their officers and deputies. Ideally, your program's director has met with local chiefs and/or the sheriff to get a feel for their unofficial standards of conduct in addition to formal policy and procedures. It is also important to understand the department's internal investigation process and supervisory structure. Every law enforcement agency is independent and handles civilian complaints differently.
Advocates and counselors must also understand the political landscape and the role of the police and fire commission, the mayor, the county executive, or other entities that may have some oversight of law enforcement agencies. Legal advocates serving rural and Indian Nations have an even more complex world.
Advocates should obtain legal advice from their agency's legal counsel before a crisis occurs.
Shelter staff need to know what to do if the police arrive at the shelter with a subpoena or arrest warrant. An abuser may engineer an arrest or other action by claiming that the victim battered him, that she has endangered or abducted the children, or that she is a danger to herself. This is an effective way to get the local police to assist him in tracking her down. Staff can be threatened with legal action for obstruction of justice, contempt of court, or harboring a criminal if they refuse to cooperate by withholding information as to the victim's whereabouts. This can occur in spite of a friendly and cooperative working relationship with the police.
Advocates — and the DV agency itself — may feel threatened if the abuser's department claims staff are protecting a "suspect" or defying a court order. The department may be able to apply political and financial pressure on the agency via its board of directors. These possibilities must be discussed with the board and executive staff. A procedure must be in place before a crisis situation. If the board and staff cannot agree on how to handle a conflict with law enforcement, or if local political realities require avoiding conflicts with the police, it may be best to refer victims of police officers to another agency.
Standard remedies and responses are limited, ineffectual, or even dangerous when the abuser is a police officer.
When a victim says, "You don't understand, he's a police officer; but this is different, he's a police officer; I can't DO that, he's a police officer," she's expressing her frustration that no one understands the many ways in which her situation is different. Safety planning is seriously challenged when the abuser is a police officer. Any remedy that relies on the criminal justice system is risky. When an officer breaks the law, the system is turned upside down. So, too, are advocates' and victims' usual safety plans.
Providing support and advocacy for a police victim requires someone who has worked with a wide range of women, understands the complexities of battering, has solid knowledge of available criminal and civil interventions, and understands the practices and politics of local law enforcement.
An experienced advocate is less likely to let her personal views dominate her work with victims.
We get frustrated when we feel we can't do anything to help police victims. Because we have made so much progress with domestic violence laws and community response, we want to do more than just be there, listen and understand. But remedies available to other victims, such as going to the police and prosecutor, are often not possible. In many ways, we have to go back to the beginning of the Battered Women's Movement when all we could do was listen to women's stories and offer support and understanding.
Many advocates have strong feelings about police officers who abuse their intimate partners. They may believe these batterers have no right to be police officers, and want the victims to cooperate with attempts to hold the officers accountable. An advocate's desire to get an abusive officer off the streets can make it hard to remember that it is not the victim's responsibility to see that the law is enforced or to reform the police department. As always, our first commitment is to support her wishes and decisions. We might be her only source of support.
Victims of police officers report that our presence and understanding is much more than they get anywhere else. We can provide critical support to a victim when the batterer is an officer. We can:
Our books are available through: